foxtales

Poems and Prose by Tim Fox

  • On Doing and Somethingness

    In my opinion, it’s better to do something than nothing.

    But that doesn’t mean you can’t take naps, or watch TV, or just goof off. I think it means you can do those things as long as you are conscious of doing those things and view them as either rewards for something you’ve already done, or as mental preparation for what you’ll do next.

    In other words, “doing” does not require filling very moment of your life with busyness. Or business. Quite the contrary. Because when your life is nothing but “doing,” you are losing time for thought on reflection. Similarly, “something” does not have to be something that earns money, or accomplishes a goal, or ticks an item off your bucket list.

    This is what I’ve learned after starting to build my own business. Non-billable time is not wasted time. Projects that don’t pay anything, or that don’t pay much, are important. All the other things I have in my life–family, reading, music, memoir–are part of the work I do that one day will be profitable, if not self-sustaining.

    Courtney Barnett’s first full-length album is called Sometimes I Sit and Think and Sometimes I Just Sit. Like all of her songs, there is wisdom in that. Just sitting can be doing something. As long as it’s not all that you do.

  • Memoiries Can’t Wait

    For a long time, I’ve thought about writing memoir. Not autobiography, which is mainly an act of chronology (this happened, then that happened, then this happened), but memoir, which is more about finding meaning and universal truth in what has happened.

    Several things have held me back. First, I’ve never been comfortable writing in the first-person, but that has started to change since I started writing my blog.

    Second, memoirs–at least the famous ones–seem to always be about deep personal trauma that I have been blessed to have never experienced: rape, incest, child abuse, horrible parents. Not part of my life. My life has been blessedly boring.

    But as painful (and, I hope, cathartic) as it must be to write about trauma, I wonder about the meaning found in an ordinary life. A life of Catholic schools, big public colleges, stable families, steady employment. A life, in short, of privilege. Maybe because such a life is more typical (or maybe not?), the meaning found in it might be applicable to more people, and thus worth exploring.

    I don’t know; this is just something I’ve started to think seriously about undertaking. I would be interested in your thoughts in the Comments section below. And while you’re at it, you can check the box to get email notification of Write Fox Blog posts.

  • Great Scott! Novel Reopens Landmark Court Case

    I wrote this review of a novelization of the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Scott v. Sandford several years ago for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, but it never appeared in the paper. The book is Two Men Before the Storm: Arba Crane’s Recollection of Dred Scott and the Supreme Court Case that Started the Civil War. The review is a remnant of my “postmodern” phase.

    “Historical fiction” is a slippery genre.

    Dred Scott. Oil on canvas by Louis Schultze, 1888. Acc. # 1897.9.1. Missouri Historical Society Museum Collections. Photograph by David Schultz, 1999. NS 23864. Photograph and scan (c) 1999-2006, Missouri Historical Society.
    Dred Scott. Oil on canvas by Louis Schultze, 1888. Acc. # 1897.9.1. Missouri Historical Society Museum Collections. Photograph by David Schultz, 1999. NS 23864. Photograph and scan (c) 1999-2006, Missouri Historical Society.

    On one hand, postmodernists might claim that the term is redundant. All “history,” they would say, is to some degree “fiction”—facts conveniently rearranged and reinterpreted to suit the political aims of history’s “winners.”

    On the other hand, traditionalists would hold that fact and fancy are mutually exclusive. There is a world that never was and the world that was, and never the twain shall meet.

    Complicating matters is one simple fact: most of what is marketed as “historical fiction” is neither good history nor good fiction. Sketchily drawn characters and anachronistic speech, attitudes and actions—to say nothing of the bodice-ripping raunch of the “historical romance” subspecies—have marred some of the better-selling examples of the genre.

    Wisely, novelist Gregory J. Wallance avoids these pitfalls in “Two Men Before the Storm,” his novelization of “the most consequential legal case in American history,” Scott v. Sandford.

    Wallance’s imaginative contribution to the well-known case of Dred Scott, the slave who sued unsuccessfully for his freedom in a series of court cases between 1847 and 1857, is to bring lawyer Arba Crane out of the shadows of history and into the center of the story.

    Wallance first encountered the “real” Arba Crane in a footnote to a book about the Scott case. The note cited a letter sent in the early 20th century to the head librarian at the Missouri Historical Society.

    Two Men Before the Storm

    The letter described how Crane—then working for Roswell Field, the prominent St. Louis attorney commonly regarded as “Dred Scott’s lawyer”—met Scott, whom Field had hired as a night janitor. The men began talking, and Crane soon became convinced that Scott had sound legal grounds to seek his freedom.

    “After I read that footnote I decided to write this book; indeed, I had to write it,” Wallance writes in his “Author’s Note.” Wallance, also an attorney, explains that he could understand the young lawyer’s loneliness working late at night. He could see how a friendship could develop between the young Crane and the slave Dred Scott.

    From that morsel of information and personal identification, Wallance grows Crane into a strong, credible character. Crane narrates the novel in the first person, beginning with his arrival in the city in the early 1850s as a brooding man escaping a domineering father, limited future and troubling past in Newfane, New Hampshire—the “real” Roswell Field’s hometown.

    Crane finds St. Louis to be a both a vibrant and violent place, full of disease, muddy streets, prostitutes and death—but most of all, it is a place where human beings were bought and sold on the steps of the city’s new courthouse, now known as the “Old Courthouse.”

    After meeting Scott, he becomes immersed in the politics of the city’s pro- and anti-slavery elite, falling in love with a fictitious Southern belle, Kate Fox, along the way. Wallance uses Fox to both explore the conflicted worldview of the Old South and to add another dimension to his imagined abolitionist, Arba Crane.

    Wallance’s crisply written novel moves quickly. He wisely avoids getting bogged down in legal minutiae, providing just enough detail for the reader to understand the legal issues at hand.

    Historians and legal scholars will have some quibbles with the liberties Wallance takes with the facts—for example, he uses court documents to construct a dialogue between attorneys and the Supreme Court judges, something he admits did not happen, to say nothing of the diminished role he gives to Roswell Field.

    Arba Crane Headstone

    My own quibble is that Wallance seems unaware, in his “Historical Notes,” that his Southern belle shares a name with one of the 19th-century sisters who started the “spiritualism” craze, Kate and Maggie Fox. Spiritualism plays a role in the novel—could he have missed, in his research, Barbara Weisberg’s 2004 book on the Fox sisters, “Talking to the Dead”? Would he have named his character “Kate Fox” had he been aware of the “real” Kate Fox?

    But such nits are truly quibbles. Fans of history and fiction alike will be unable to deny the power of Wallance’s story, which calls a truce between the warring armies of fact and fiction—at least for now.

  • Francis Park–David R. Francis’s “Other” St. Louis Legacy

    I walked to Francis Park and back this morning with daughter Kate, and it reminded me of this piece I wrote many years ago but I don’t think ever published anyplace, though parts of it were used (with my blessing) in a history of St. Louis Hills. It’s based on historical documents held at the Missouri History Museum’s Library and Research center.

    In the winter of 1916, David R. Francis—the man who brought St. Louis the 1904 World’s Fair—sent a package from Petrograd, Russia, to St. Louis. It contained Christmas gifts for his friends and family back home. “Mrs. Francis” received a silver box, salt cellar, and “Kirkland Scotland souvenir ‘Cider Cup,’” while his daughters-in-law got gifts ranging from an “ash receiver” to a “tea strainer.”

    Lanai Coffee is one of the newest additions to the park, featuring a spectacular view of tennis court, squash court, and verdant trees.
    Lanai Coffee is one of the newest additions to the park, featuring a spectacular view of tennis court, squash court, and verdant trees.

     

    Missing from Francis’s list of goodies was his Christmas gift to the city of St. Louis: Francis Park.

    Francis, in Russia since April 1916 as the newly appointed U.S. ambassador, had been negotiating for several months with Commissioner of Parks and Recreation Nelson Cunliff. Cunliff knew that the southwest corner of the city was ripe for development, and he wanted to build a park there before land became too expensive.

    More than thirty years earlier, Francis had purchased 377 acres of gently rolling hillside in this part St. Louis, then known as Southampton. His gift of the park—60 acres bordered by Eichelberger, Donovan, and today’s Nottingham and Tamm—still left him with a sizable piece of property, but the gift, as the St. Louis Republic editorialized, was “an immortal thing.”

    St. Louisans streamed to Twelfth Street on Christmas Eve, 1916, to see the Municipal Christmas Tree light up and Santa Clause (portrayed by a man named Otto Karbe) deliver the deed granting Francis Park to the city.

    Under the headline “D. R. Francis Gives City 60-Acre Park,” the Republic described Francis’s Christmas present, as well as the gifts of two other prominent St. Louisans: lawyer and businessman G. A. Buder donated a lot for a “community house,” and brewer August A. Busch gave three “Pickering hogs” to the zoo.

    This whimsical Gumbey-meets-dinosaur-meets-Monsters Inc. character was carved out of a tree stump near the playground.
    This whimsical Gumbey-meets-dinosaur-meets-Monsters Inc. character was carved out of a tree stump near the playground.

    Since David R. Francis was in Russia, Perry Francis—his son and legal representative—stood in for him at the ceremony, but in an editorial entitled “In the Stocking of St. Louis,” the paper let Francis speak for himself: “St. Louis has done everything for me; I’d like to do a little for St. Louis.”

    Of course, he wanted to do a little something for himself, too. When his shipment of St. Louis newspapers arrived in Russia, he complained to Perry that no other paper had given the story much ink. “You must have attempted to give the Republic a ‘scoop,’” he wrote, “but if so I think you made a mistake as the donation of ground worth not less than $60,000 is a matter concerning which all of the newspapers should have been simultaneously advised.”

    Francis’s deed with the city, which was not formalized until July 1917, put some restrictions on the gift, though nothing unreasonable. The property, Francis wrote, was to be used for “Park and Recreational purposes only” and cared for by the city. If anyone ever tried to use it for other purposes, it would revert to Francis or his heirs. And it was to be known forever as “Francis Park.”

    A park is constantly changing. City employees remove a diseased cottonwood tree.
    A park is constantly changing. City employees remove a diseased cottonwood tree.

     

    World War I delayed any serious park improvements for several years but, in November 1923, Cunliff—who had since been made Director of Public Welfare—announced a novel plan. Under his direction, first-time offenders from the City Workhouse were encamped on the grounds to do the landscaping, clean-up, and other work that would transform a chunk of the Francis Farm into a first-class city park.

    “The men who will form the park colony are not criminals,” Cunliff told the Globe-Democrat. “They are men who have made but one bad step, have offended but once, and who want to live down that one mistake. They will be workmen serving out their terms at honest labor for the city.”

    Fourteen men arrived at the park on November 6, but Cunliff had arranged accommodations for forty. With his unique scheme, the Director of Public Welfare set Francis Park on its way.

    As we continue to ask how St. Louis can improve, we should look back occasionally to our past—to a time when a world war could postpone, not cancel, our dreams; when community leaders had visions beyond, not limited to, themselves; and when even our criminals were viewed as assets, not liabilities.

  • Does This Run Stop at Eichelberger Street?

    In life and running, you must have a plan: a clear-cut guide to exactly how you will get where you are going, exactly how long it will take, and exactly how you will know when you have arrived.

    You must hold this plan firmly in your mind at all times before you start to implement it. You must be firmly convinced you will not waver from it, no matter what happens between now and the start of your plan. You must do this because you are a Responsible Adult who has Big Responsibilities and you have not gotten to be this kind of person by being a Lollygagging Cakesniffer.

    Cakesniffer

    Then, as soon as you start to implement your plan, you must blow it all to hell.

    You must do this because that is really what being a Responsible Adult is about. It’s not about starting at Neosho, going west to Jamieson, turning south to Willmore Park, running through the park (the path that winds around the pond, not the one that goes by the big old tree, because that one has a hellacaious hill, whereas on the other path all you have to do is dodge duck droppings and angry geese the size of armadillos …), east to Hampton, and north back to Neosho.

    No.

    Being a Responsible Adult is about standing in front of your house on Neosho after you have developed your brilliant plan, looking west, and thinking, “Forget that. East.”

    Because you know that as a Responsible Adult, you will be able to handle whatever uprooted chunks of sidewalk, ill-timed traffic signals, or reeking piles of dog doo stand in your way. It’s the Lollygagging Cakesniffers who never change course, or their minds, or their hearts.

    And if there’s one thing you, as a Responsible Adult, do not want to be in life, it’s a Lollygagging Cakesniffer.

     

  • All Aboard? The M-Train!

    If Courtney Barnett had to lose “Best New Artist” to someone at this year’s Grammys, I’m glad it was to Meghan Trainor.Thank You

    Trainor–whose second album, Thank You, drops today–brought a blast of non-preachy positive body image lyrics to the world with her first single,  “All About That Bass.”

    Her millennial-friendly feminism was much needed in a pop universe overdosing on codependent-is-cool fantasies of brushing one’s teeth with Jack Daniels, puking in bathtubs, taking your clothes off on the second date, and being sent off to rehab.

    The follow-up single, “Dear Future Husband,” added a naughty-but-nice tease with an almost-rhyme using the word “bed.” Her duo with John Legend, “Like I’m Gonna Lose You,” turned the average blah-blah love song into a meditation on mortality, while “Lips Are Movin’” was the perfect 21st-century kiss-off (“You can buy me diamond earrings / And deny-ny-ny, ny-ny-ny, deny-ny / But I smell her on your collar so goodbye-bye-bye”).

    With all of those hit songs on one album, Trainor was already not a one-hit-wonder–but what would she do next?

    Well, if the first single from Thank You, “No,” is an indication, Trainor has pulled off the greatest musical second act since the Beastie Boys followed up their  frat-boy-anthem-meets-Zeppelin-catalog-sample debut, License to Ill, with the incredibly dense, rich, and only occasionally misogynistic Paul’s Boutique.

    “No” is one of the stickiest earworms ever written (“I never learned to cook / But I can write a hook,” she sang in “Dear Future Husbund.” Indeed.), but its feminism is even clearer, more direct, less tentative: “Thank you in advance, I don’t wanna dance (nope) / I don’t need your hands all over me / If I want a man, then I’mma get a man / But it’s never my priority.”

    Yes, the pool anthem of this summer was released weeks ago. But I bet you already love it:

    My name is NO
    My sign is NO
    My number is NO
    You need to let it go
    You need to let it go
    Need to let it go
    Nah to the ah to the no, no, no …

     

  • The Art of Procrastination

    I have learned that part of every writing project I take on is the feeling, usually on the day it is due or the days leading up to it, that I have bitten off more than I can chew.

    Right now I’m struggling with my two-book review for the Post, due today, of course. Part of the challenge is condensing two 400-page books into 600 words. The right words. At the right time.

    Well, it’s intimidating. And in some ways, it’s more difficult when you have a choice of media to use. To compose on the computer, or to work it out the hard way on a yellow legal pad, scratching and deleting and moving as I go? Almost always it ends up being a combination of approaches, including thinking about it distractedly as I stare into space while driving around town, eating breakfast, drinking coffee, or running.

    I’ve often said that procrastination is a critical part of the writing process, or any creative process–because you aren’t really procrastinating, you’re working it out in your head. Then when it comes time to actually do it, a lot of the thinking has already been done.

    So what it comes down to at the end is discipline. Forcing yourself to make the time and finally do it, because it the end, at should be transcription as much as creation–taking what you’ve already created in your brain and making it a physical thing.

    So … back to work.

  • The National Blues Museum: How ‘Lou Can You Get?

    NBM StreetfrontThe National Blues Museum, which opened to the public April 2, 2016, rightfully places St. Louis among other American music capitals like New Orleans, Memphis, Nashville, and Chicago. If Route 66 is the Mother Road, the blues is St. Louis’s Mother Lode.

    The museum is in the heart of downtown St. Louis’s Mercantile Exchange District on Washington Avenue. The Mississippi River flows a few blocks to the east. On its shores, thousands of newly freed slaves first set foot in Missouri more than a century ago.

    Those former slaves, their families, and the people who followed them from throughout the south carried with them an emotional legacy of oppression that flowed in their veins and out of their fingertips, their voices, and their tapping toes through the blues–a musical form that is the root of all popular music before and since, from jazz to rock to country and beyond.

    “The movement of the blues from south to north, its survival and spread through ever-changing technology, and its continuing legacy and influence are the museum’s main interpretive themes,” says Jacqueline Dace, the museum’s director of internal affairs, who walked with me through the museum.

    One of the first stories shared in the museum’s 16,000 square feet of exhibit space is that of W. C. Handy. Handy came to St. Louis in the 1890s from Alabama and spent his first Missouri nights sleeping on the riverfront. His 1914 composition “St. Louis Blues” immortalized the connection between the River City and the blues. Before the automobile, most people moving north from the Deep South had to go through St. Louis, bringing the music with them. Even as some people moved on, the music stayed.

    The museum then opens up to pay homage to the women of the blues–including the only video that exists of Mimi Smith, singing, appropriately enough, “St. Louis Blues.” This space also features exhibits that recognize the blues’ early branches, from jug bands and tent shows to vaudeville, which expanded the music’s audience in the north beyond urban areas.

    Because the blues originated as an oral tradition, it had to be written down and recorded to become a permanent part of American culture. Sheet music began to be widely published and distributed in the early 20th century, but in the 1930s the father-son team of John and Alan Lomax traveled thrNBM Posteroughout the south with a car full of recording equipment to capture the music as it was actually played–and felt.

    Their recordings, housed in the Library of Congress, preserved the art and soul of the blues. Examples of the Lomax’s equipment are on display, in front of a photograph showing the interior of their heavily loaded car.

    “It’s amazing to me that they traveled around with all of that recording equipment, when today you could do what they did with your phone,” says Dace. “I can’t imagine what the musicians thought when they saw them.”

    In the 1940s and ’50s, Chicago gained an upper hand over St. Louis in the blues tradition because of the Windy City’s many recording studios. By then, it was easier for musicians to get to Chicago, and selling recorded music allowed musicians to make a living by playing the blues. But St. Louis had a secret weapon: Chuck Berry.

    Berry, who still lives near St. Louis and until recently performed monthly at Blueberry Hill on the Delmar Loop, brought the blues to American teenagers in the 1950s.

    “He is the father of rock ‘n’ roll,” Dace says, pointing out a display of the diverse group of artists who have recorded Berry’s classic “Johnny B. Goode.” From Judas Priest to Emmylou Harris to Peter Tosh, “Johnny B. Goode” is the story of the blues itself: the “country boy” who lived “deep down Louisiana close to New Orleans” and “never ever learned to read or write so well / But he could play the guitar just like a-ringing a bell.”

    A decade later, as middle-class American teenagers were discovering folk music, English musicians like the Rolling Stones were discovering the blues. As Richard Cohen points out in his forthcoming book, The Sun and the Moon and the Rolling Stones, they were children of World War II–kids who had grown up in bombed-out buildings, living on rations into the 1950s. The blues’ themes of “sadness, solitude, and forces outside of one’s control,” to quote an exhibit label, resonated powerfully with them. The “British Invasion” was on the way–ironically, with a musical form that was distinctly American.

    One of the museum’s most poignant cases memorializes what Dace calls “the two kings”–Bobby Rush, King of the Chitlin’ Circuit, and B. B. King, King of the Blues. The case houses one of Rush’s outfits and King’s famous guitar, “Lucille,” on loan from the B. B. King Museum in Indianola, Mississippi.

    “A musician named Lil’ Ray Neal played this particular guitar at B. B.’s funeral,” Dace explains. “The story is that as soon as he started playing it, it started to rain. Neal just started going crazy on the guitar. And as soon as he stopped playing, it stopped raining. That’s why I say Lucille has a mind of her own. Lucille is real.”

    Dace also recalls when National Blues Museum Executive Director Dion Brown (former executive director of the B. B. King Museum) took Rush through the museum a few months ago.

    NBM Harmonica

    “He got kind of emotional when he saw this case,” she says. “He said it was the last time he would ever appear with B. B. King.”

    The museum makes its own contribution to blues’ technological heritage through its interactive exhibits. At “Jug Band Jammin’,”  visitors can record themselves “playing” traditional jug band instruments, like the washboard, and watch a playback of the jam session on video. Another exhibit demonstrates how different artists have interpreted various blues songs over the years–Led Zeppelin’s version of Blind Willie Johnson’s “Nobody’s Fault but Mine” took me back to high school.

    But the highlight is “AAB,” the musical experience that follows visitors throughout the museum as they create the lyrics, title, and album cover to their own blues songs, adding harmonica, piano, and guitar while exploring the museum. A recording of the song and the lyrics are sent to the “musicians” via email before leaving the museum.

    One of the great myths of American society that has been exploded in recent years is that of the post-racial society. It occurred to me while touring the museum and seeing the many photos and videos of white musicians performing traditionally black music, often alongside black musicians, that music may be the only place where true racial harmony is possible.

    Someday, that harmony may flow out of the music and into everyday life. But until then, there’s the National Blues Museum.

    National Blues Museum Hours, Ticketing, and Parking Info

  • Mind Games

    “What is the ugliest part of your body?” Frank Zappa once asked. “I think it’s your MIND,” he answered, after considering your nose and your toes as possibilities.

    That is certainly true when it comes to exercise. All of the other reasons/excuses/rationalizations for not doing it are ancillary to the work of the true enemy, your MIND.

    So much of exercise is psychological, and this is especially true of running. I sometimes say that running is the ultimate proof of “if you think you can and if you think you can’t, you’re right.” It’s mind over matter. It’s thinking, “I can’t go on,” and “I don’t want to go on,” and “I just want to walk,” and “I want to be in bed,” and running anyway. Overcoming your mind is the hardest part of the whole process, and it is a process: getting out of bed, getting dressed, getting gear together, getting out the door.

    But when I’m actually doing it, instead of thinking about doing it or all the reasons that I can’t do it, my mind is my greatest ally. Focusing on pace has helped with that. So has imagining climbing a flight of stairs when going up hill, or spotting a landmark ahead and thinking, “I just have to make it to the fire hydrant. OK, now I just have to make it to that mailbox …” The little victories add up.

    Some weeks are good for exercise, and some weeks are not good, but the good weeks always feel better than the bad weeks. On the good weeks, everything is clearer, and I don’t have the nagging feeling that I should be doing something. On the bad weeks my mind becomes ugly again and everything else is muddled, too.

    But every day, the one thought that keeps me going is this: Even the most out-of-shape person out running is out running! I think they have the most beautiful minds of all.

  • Pop Life

    The first thing I liked about Iggy Pop’s new album, Post Pop Depression (Loma Vista), is that the band members are not just pictured but actually identified on the front of the album. It’s as if Pop, who has been mostly a solo artist since his band The Stooges broke up in 1974, is saying, “I can’t do this alone, guys.”

    And why should he? Pop turned 69 last week. He has lived a life that would have killed most people a long time ago, but he is still here, writing lyrics that are as powerful as anything on my favorite Pop album, 1977’s The Idiot. In fact, they are more powerful because many of them are about himself, and age, and the inevitability of death–a theme that must have hit Pop like a thunderbolt when his pal and producer David Bowie died earlier this year.

    The album opens with “Break into Your Heart.” “I’m gonna break into your heart / I’m gonna craw under your skin / I’m gonna break into your heart / And follow / Till I see where you begin,” Pop intones. No, this is not a love song; it’s a plea for understanding from a man who has lived under the shadow of his own mythology for forty years. At the end, he adds to those opening lines, “And the wall comes tumbling down / And you finally let me in.”

    “American Valhalla” reveals direct autobiographical references to that mythology and its dark limits. “I’ve shot my gun / I’ve used my knife / It hasn’t been and easy life.” The band eventually drops away completely, and we get Pop’s voice alone, growling, “I’ve nothing but by name / I’ve nothing but my name”

    In sum, Post Pop Depression is less “Lust for Life” and more “Prayer for Life.” It’s the angry young man of Fun House and Raw Power turned inward. But there is plenty of anger still there. Because this is a family blog, I won’t quote verbatim his kiss-off to Internet trolls that closes the album in “Paraguay,” but it’s great–and so is Post Pop Depression.